TNL.net is designed for modern browsers but the content is still readable in older ones. If you want to ensure the best experience, please install a browser that was developed after 2009.

tnl.net

Microsoft and AOL: Friends again

Microsoft and Amer­ica Online set­tled their browser law­suit, putting an end to spec­u­la­tions that AOL would dump IE from its lead­ing client. As part of the deal, AOL receives a seven year royalty-free license to include Inter­net Explorer and will get an early peek at any­thing new in Red­mond. Most inter­est­ing to me in the dif­fer­ent reports I have read is the fol­low­ing state­ment from Bill Gates:

We have shared ideas on how to han­dle dig­i­tal media

. What exactly does that mean? I wish some­one else elab­o­rated on that point as it isn’t clear. Does it mean that they will col­lab­o­rate on devel­op­ment of joint ser­vices? Does it mean they will col­lab­o­rate in the devel­op­ment of joint product?

What­ever hap­pens is a bit wor­ri­some as we now have the two largest play­ers on the Amer­i­can Inter­net essen­tially join­ing forces. Microsoft has a com­mand­ing lead in the desk­top OS and the web browser mar­ket. AOL hold most of the remain­der of the browser mar­ket (yes, a few peo­ple out there use browsers like Mozilla, myself included), and has a sim­i­larly large lead in the IM and access mar­ket. The two of them join­ing forces leave cold beads of sweaty fear run­ning down my back.

Obvi­ous losers in today’s announce­ment are Yahoo, which will have to fight an uphill bat­tle in terms of mak­ing their mes­sag­ing client remain a viable option in a mar­ket where AIM and MSN mes­sen­ger will inter-operate, Real Net­works, which will have to fig­ure out how to makes its media player more com­pet­i­tive in the mar­ket­place (part of the agree­ment between Microsoft and AOL includes the right for AOL to use the Win­dows Media 9 soft­ware suite).

Sur­pris­ingly, few of the press reports seem to cover the point about Win­dows Media 9. This is pretty sig­nif­i­cant as it could play a major role in shap­ing the future of dig­i­tal media. At the cur­rent time, Microsoft is in a three way bat­tle with Real Net­works and Apple (which makes quick­time) for future supremacy over next gen­er­a­tion online audio and video. Offer­ing their media suite to AOL gives them tremen­dous lever­age as it could increase their mar­ket­shares by sev­eral mil­lions. Con­sider yesterday’s announce­ment that AOL was drop­ping Real from its part­ner lineup, it looks like Real will have to even­tu­ally trans­form itself to the point where let­ting go of its own tech­nol­ogy might make sense. At that point, only two play­ers will be left, with Microsoft becom­ing the dom­i­nant player in the arena, and Apple pick­ing up the remain­der of the mar­ket. Smaller for­mats, like Ogg Vor­bis, will remain the province of afi­ciona­dos but won’t gain much in the way of mar­ket­shares. The wor­ri­some part about all this is that DRM restric­tions on both end might get worse and worse as time goes on. I have already com­plained about Apple not dis­clos­ing what DRM setup it was offer­ing and it seems that they are already tight­en­ing the vise. I some­how doubt that a new alliance between Microsoft and AOL will be more magnanimous.

How­ever, it’s not all bad news. PC Mag­a­zine reports that AOL does not intent to close Netscape, which might be good, though it is not clear why they are doing so.

Originally published on May 29, 2003 in Business . You may find related thoughts pieces under the following terms: , , , ,