<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tipping the Edge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tnl.net/blog/2003/07/07/tipping-the-edge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2003/07/07/tipping-the-edge/</link>
	<description>Turning Data into Knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:38:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Safari: Apple&#8217;s New Platform?</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2003/07/07/tipping-the-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-28695</link>
		<dc:creator>Safari: Apple&#8217;s New Platform?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2003/07/07/tipping-the-edge/#comment-28695</guid>
		<description>[...] next step to think of is that while an application may make sense in terms of running fully online, even Google has seen some of t.... Their offering of the Google Gears showed that they are interested in moving some of their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] next step to think of is that while an application may make sense in terms of running fully online, even Google has seen some of t&#8230;. Their offering of the Google Gears showed that they are interested in moving some of their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Of Interest</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2003/07/07/tipping-the-edge/comment-page-1/#comment-24614</link>
		<dc:creator>Of Interest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2003/07/07/tipping-the-edge/#comment-24614</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;t make much sense then. In a world where bandwidth is high enough, applications can now resides largely on the network so Apple pushing Safari as a new platform could make some degree of sense.  The next step to think of is that while an application may make sense in terms of running fully online, even Google has seen some of the limitations of that model. Their offering of the Google Gears showed that they are interested in moving some of their application to an environment where a network connection is not required 100 percent of the time.  So Apple&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->t make much sense then. In a world where bandwidth is high enough, applications can now resides largely on the network so Apple pushing Safari as a new platform could make some degree of sense.  The next step to think of is that while an application may make sense in terms of running fully online, even Google has seen some of the limitations of that model. Their offering of the Google Gears showed that they are interested in moving some of their application to an environment where a network connection is not required 100 percent of the time.  So Apple<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
