<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Secrets of the A-list bloggers: Technorati vs. Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/</link>
	<description>Turning Data into Knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:38:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Technorati Yahoo and Google Too</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/comment-page-1/#comment-28689</link>
		<dc:creator>Technorati Yahoo and Google Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/#comment-28689</guid>
		<description>[...] 20, 2005Welcome to TNL.net. If you like this content, you may consider subscribing to the RSS feed.In the last entry on the subject, we took a look at how Technorati and Google compared. From there, we discovered that Technorati [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 20, 2005Welcome to <acronym title="Tristan Nicolas Louis">TNL</acronym>.net. If you like this content, you may consider subscribing to the <acronym title="Really Simple Syndication">RSS</acronym> feed.In the last entry on the subject, we took a look at how Technorati and Google compared. From there, we discovered that Technorati [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By:  Newspapergrl</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/comment-page-1/#comment-24106</link>
		<dc:creator> Newspapergrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/#comment-24106</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;Also blogs have more links per words, which helps their rankings too. If you have a higher Google page rank (which high quality links provide) then youâ€™ll also get indexed more often. They feed off each other.  I read an interesting post about how Google and Technorati tend to favor (by indexing) the top 10 most-read blogs.  So Iâ€™m still trying to solve a problem. My blog is listed in Technorati and in Google. However, when I went from Blogger to Wordpress it messed up the title tags. So every post title shows up in&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->Also blogs have more links per words, which helps their rankings too. If you have a higher Google page rank (which high quality links provide) then youâ€™ll also get indexed more often. They feed off each other.  I read an interesting post about how Google and Technorati tend to favor (by indexing) the top 10 most-read blogs.  So Iâ€™m still trying to solve a problem. My blog is listed in Technorati and in Google. However, when I went from Blogger to Wordpress it messed up the title tags. So every post title shows up in<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Music reBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/comment-page-1/#comment-24543</link>
		<dc:creator>New Music reBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/#comment-24543</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;performance. Matthew Guerreri&#039;s blog is getting linked a lot lately, as the Technorati ranking shows, but by Google standards he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn&#039;t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are. &lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->performance. Matthew Guerreri&#8217;s blog is getting linked a lot lately, as the Technorati ranking shows, but by Google standards he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn&#8217;t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are. <!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musical Perceptions</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/comment-page-1/#comment-24544</link>
		<dc:creator>Musical Perceptions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/#comment-24544</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;performance. Matthew Guerreri&#039;s blog is getting linked a lot lately, as the Technorati ranking shows, but by Google standards he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn&#039;t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are.&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->performance. Matthew Guerreri&#8217;s blog is getting linked a lot lately, as the Technorati ranking shows, but by Google standards he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn&#8217;t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are.<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Of Interest </title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/comment-page-1/#comment-24686</link>
		<dc:creator>Of Interest </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2005/06/13/secrets-of-the-a-list-bloggers-technorati-vs-google/#comment-24686</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--><!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
