<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati Yahoo and Google Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/</link>
	<description>Turning Data into Knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:38:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Musical Perceptions</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/comment-page-1/#comment-24545</link>
		<dc:creator>Musical Perceptions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/#comment-24545</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn&#039;t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are.  Update: Chris Foley has generated his own list, using subscription rates on Bloglines&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn&#8217;t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are.  Update: Chris Foley has generated his own list, using subscription rates on Bloglines<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Music reBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/comment-page-1/#comment-24546</link>
		<dc:creator>New Music reBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/#comment-24546</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn&#039;t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are.   Originally from Musical Perceptions, ReBlogged by newmusicrebloggers on May 21, 2007 at 04:21 PM&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn&#8217;t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are.   Originally from Musical Perceptions, ReBlogged by newmusicrebloggers on May 21, 2007 at 04:21 PM<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Of Interest</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/comment-page-1/#comment-24573</link>
		<dc:creator>Of Interest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/#comment-24573</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;blogger compensations while at the same time analyzing the output of A-list bloggers and how they were linked. The links got me to then consider how an engine like Technorati fared against the big three: Google, Yahoo, and MSN. The results revealed some interesting data and were (and are still) discussed for months. Because of all this activity, I also started noticing the value of archival content, around the same time as Chris Anderson started thinking about the&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->blogger compensations while at the same time analyzing the output of A-list bloggers and how they were linked. The links got me to then consider how an engine like Technorati fared against the big three: Google, Yahoo, and <acronym title="Microsoft Network">MSN</acronym>. The results revealed some interesting data and were (and are still) discussed for months. Because of all this activity, I also started noticing the value of archival content, around the same time as Chris Anderson started thinking about the<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
