<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati Yahoo and Google Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/</link>
	<description>Turning Data into Knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Music reBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/comment-page-1/#comment-24546</link>
		<dc:creator>New Music reBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 06:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/#comment-24546</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn&#039;t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are.   Originally from Musical Perceptions, ReBlogged by newmusicrebloggers on May 21, 2007 at 04:21 PM&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn’t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are.   Originally from Musical Perceptions, ReBlogged by newmusicrebloggers on May 21, 2007 at 04:21 PM<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Of Interest</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/comment-page-1/#comment-24573</link>
		<dc:creator>Of Interest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 06:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/#comment-24573</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;blogger compensations while at the same time analyzing the output of A-list bloggers and how they were linked. The links got me to then consider how an engine like Technorati fared against the big three: Google, Yahoo, and MSN. The results revealed some interesting data and were (and are still) discussed for months. Because of all this activity, I also started noticing the value of archival content, around the same time as Chris Anderson started thinking about the&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->blogger compensations while at the same time analyzing the output of A-list bloggers and how they were linked. The links got me to then consider how an engine like Technorati fared against the big three: Google, Yahoo, and MSN. The results revealed some interesting data and were (and are still) discussed for months. Because of all this activity, I also started noticing the value of archival content, around the same time as Chris Anderson started thinking about the<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musical Perceptions</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/comment-page-1/#comment-24545</link>
		<dc:creator>Musical Perceptions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2005/06/20/technorati-yahoo-and-google-too/#comment-24545</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn&#039;t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are.  Update: Chris Foley has generated his own list, using subscription rates on Bloglines&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->he would be down at #90 (oops, I just mentioned one). So I trust Technorati more for this use. Here is an old study comparing Google with Technorati, though some of his interpretations of the statistics are incorrect, particularly when comparing Google and Yahoo. Technorati doesn’t record nearly as many links, the question is which links are important, and how old the links are.  Update: Chris Foley has generated his own list, using subscription rates on Bloglines<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 8/16 queries in 0.140 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.tnl.net @ 2012-02-10 01:23:11 -->
