<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Tense &#8211; IPzation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tnl.net/blog/2006/05/12/future-tense-ipzation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2006/05/12/future-tense-ipzation/</link>
	<description>Turning Data into Knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:38:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The TNL.net weblog &#187; Could Apple Solidify GSM in the US?</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2006/05/12/future-tense-ipzation/comment-page-1/#comment-2161</link>
		<dc:creator>The TNL.net weblog &#187; Could Apple Solidify GSM in the US?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2006/05/12/future-tense-ipzation/#comment-2161</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, all this is predicated on those standards still being relevant further down the line. If phones move towards more of a VoIP model, as I suspect will happen over the long run, this may all be irrelevant but, for the time being, a major shift of that kind could have tremendous impact in the telecom world. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, all this is predicated on those standards still being relevant further down the line. If phones move towards more of a <acronym title="Voice Over Internet Protocol">VoIP</acronym> model, as I suspect will happen over the long run, this may all be irrelevant but, for the time being, a major shift of that kind could have tremendous impact in the telecom world. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Could Apple Solidify GSM in the US?</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2006/05/12/future-tense-ipzation/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Could Apple Solidify GSM in the US?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2006/05/12/future-tense-ipzation/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] Of course, all this is predicated on those standards still being relevant further down the line. If phones move towards more of a VoIP model, as I suspect will happen over the long run, this may all be irrelevant but, for the time being, a major shift of that kind could have tremendous impact in the telecom world. in Convergence, Apple, Wireless -  - - No Responses Leave a comment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Of course, all this is predicated on those standards still being relevant further down the line. If phones move towards more of a <acronym title="Voice Over Internet Protocol">VoIP</acronym> model, as I suspect will happen over the long run, this may all be irrelevant but, for the time being, a major shift of that kind could have tremendous impact in the telecom world. in Convergence, Apple, Wireless &#8211;  &#8211; - No Responses Leave a comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reshaping TV</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2006/05/12/future-tense-ipzation/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Reshaping TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnl.net/blog/2006/05/12/future-tense-ipzation/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeff Jarvis uses the the term exploding TV to talk about the current changes in the TV industry. I believe is contention is wrong: TV is not exploding but rather, it is imploding. The current model is predicated on inefficiencies in the way content is distributed. However, in a future where IPzation rules, TV is trying to reform itself into something new and here, it runs into some problems. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeff Jarvis uses the the term exploding <acronym title="Television">TV</acronym> to talk about the current changes in the <acronym title="Television">TV</acronym> industry. I believe is contention is wrong: <acronym title="Television">TV</acronym> is not exploding but rather, it is imploding. The current model is predicated on inefficiencies in the way content is distributed. However, in a future where IPzation rules, <acronym title="Television">TV</acronym> is trying to reform itself into something new and here, it runs into some problems. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
