TNL.net is designed for modern browsers but the content is still readable in older ones. If you want to ensure the best experience, please install a browser that was developed after 2009.

tnl.net

Personal Relationship Manager

I am a tad obses­sive about my address book. While there are sev­eral thou­sand peo­ple in it, I tend to believe that I need to make sure that they stay cur­rent and I look to my address book as the cen­ter of my social net­work. but it ought to work more like a per­sonal rela­tion­ship manager.

I was recently describ­ing my update process to David Strom, after he had posted an entry on his blog about how poor the con­tact man­age­ment sys­tem in Gmail was, and I hit upon a real­iza­tion: A lot of the work that goes into keep­ing all that infor­ma­tion up to date seems to be some­thing that ought to be more suited to some level of automa­tion. Why is it that there is no real link­age between my address book, dif­fer­ent email sys­tems, social net­works, IM sys­tems, Skype (and other voice over IP solu­tions) and my mobile phone? Each of those appears to live in a silo, unable to offer me a full view of the peo­ple I know.

While Plaxo does a good job of syn­chro­niz­ing meta­data about peo­ple (What I would con­sider as rank, name, and ser­ial num­ber ie. the basics like phys­i­cal address, IM address, phone, and email), it has yet to evolve into a solu­tion that would give me a full view of the rela­tion­ships I have.

I also played with a num­ber of CRM pack­ages like Sug­ar­CRM but ulti­mately, they fail because their view is com­pletely sales-centric, with the idea of peo­ple being largely seen as mem­bers of a com­pany and sales prospects to be closed. I am not much of a sales­per­son (unless you con­sider push­ing new ideas on peo­ple a type of sale, which arguably it is) but my view of the world is much richer than that. I don’t want to think of peo­ple as buyers.

How­ever, the con­cepts of group­ing infor­ma­tion in CRMs is some­what attrac­tive. What I want is a view of my rela­tion­ship with peo­ple that would group:

The inter­est­ing thing is that each of this infor­ma­tion is avail­able in a dig­i­tized fash­ion but there is no cen­tral­ized point that allows me to see said infor­ma­tion about Joe Smith.

Why is that?

So I’d like to sug­gest the cre­ation of a new class of soft­ware called the “Per­sonal Rela­tion­ship Man­ager” or PRM. The pur­pose of a PRM would be to help you man­age your life instead of try­ing to man­age sales.

Basic Per­sonal Rela­tion­ship Manager

Of course, peo­ple are going to say that this prod­uct or that prod­uct solves my exist­ing prob­lem. In order to get those peo­ple to think before they push their solu­tion, let me describe in details what I want:

Con­tact Information

Con­ver­sa­tions and Status

Input

Pro­gram­ming Bits

So the pur­pose of the sys­tem, once built, would be to give me a view of my friends/contacts/etc… that is con­sol­i­dated. It would prob­a­bly pro­vide me with a high level con­tact overview (list­ing all the ways to get in touch with some­one), and then allow me to drill on the dif­fer­ent con­ver­sa­tions I’ve had with the per­son across a vari­ety of sys­tems (Email, IM, phone, social nets) as well as give me an overview of what they’ve been up to thanks to a sta­tus mes­sage and socially aware apps screen. And it would have to do all that with­out me chang­ing any of the sys­tems I’m cur­rently using. It’s a tall order but it’s one that, if sat­is­fied, could eas­ily become the cen­tral way for peo­ple to man­age their relationship.

If your prod­uct does indeed sat­isfy all those require­ments, you may have made a sale. And if you have an inter­est in devel­op­ing a PRM, I’ll be happy to be an alpha tester.

Originally published on December 10, 2007 in Media, Personal . You may find related thoughts pieces under the following terms: , , , ,

  • http://www.charleshudson.net Charles Hud­son

    Very nice post on this topic. I spend a lot of time think­ing and writ­ing about the ideal con­tact man­age­ment sys­tems, most of which use email as the seed. I had high hopes that High­rise would deliver on this promise, but it did not.

    If you want to check out some of my posts, you can see most of them here: http://www.charleshudson.net/?cat=7

  • http://www.tnl.net/blog/ Tris­tan Louis

    feld.comfeld.comSeems there are some issues with my track­backs but check out Brad Feld’s answer to this which high­lights that I for­got to include blog com­ments into the over­all view. It’s def­i­nitely some­thing that would need to go in there too…

  • http://www.native-edge.blogspot.com Andrew

    If you find one let me know! I’ve been col­lect­ing addresses and con­tacts in var­i­ous for­mats for years, but it is just begin­ning to get crit­i­cal. As much as pos­si­ble I try and keep things up to date in Out­look as that’s where I email from and sync the rest to that. I use the ‘Con­tacts’ field in tasks as much as pos­si­ble and then use the ‘Activ­i­ties’ tab in Con­tacts to see when and how I have con­tacted peo­ple. But it doesn’t cover all bases — if only Microsoft had thought far enough ahead to set the Jour­nal func­tion up properly.You can set Skype up to use the Jour­nal func­tion — but that doesn’t work with a Skype-out call.

  • http://www.crowdstorm.co.uk Philip Wilkin­son

    Wasn’t this the con­cept being Plaxo when it first started out?

  • http://foliovision.com/ Alec

    I wouldn’t trust my own and my friends (even more so) data (con­glom­er­ated) to any online ser­vice. Espe­cially one with a name like Plaxo (it sounds more like phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals than any­thing else).

    I don’t think this solu­tion exists — will exist — some­thing like the per­fect PDA (think Palm), this is just a chimera of our imagination.

    As soon as we think we can touch it, it will be gone. In a mist of spam and pri­vacy violations.

  • http://howardgreenstein.com/blog/ Howard Green­stein

    Great Job cap­tur­ing this. Would openSo­cial help? As I have most of this data between plaxo, Google apps, and open things like Word­Press, it seems it should be acces­si­ble (FB is an obvi­ous excep­tion).
    To Alec’s point, no, I want to own this data con­glom­er­a­tion — but parts of the data itself will be in the network.

  • http://www.tnl.net/blog/ Tris­tan Louis

    By what I’ve seen of OpenSo­cial, it wouldn’t do the trick. It might cover some of the link­ages but not the end of end…

  • Pingback: Here Comes Trouble: Conversation Threading - GigaOM

  • Travis

    Great sum­mary of an appli­ca­tion that I have been look­ing for years. I am not a devel­oper, but have been work­ing on devel­op­ing some­thing in Ora­cle APEX for my own use. Until then, jib­ber­job­ber is a close second.