<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Storms Hollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/</link>
	<description>Turning Data into Knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple: Of Tablets and TVs &#171; The TNL.net weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34887</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple: Of Tablets and TVs &#171; The TNL.net weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34887</guid>
		<description>[...] it seems odd that it would be working so hard to attempt to cater to the video-specific crowd: iTunes Extra, the rumored dealings with Disney and CBS, the increased partnerships to release movies on iTunes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] it seems odd that it would be working so hard to attempt to cater to the video-specific crowd: iTunes Extra, the rumored dealings with Disney and CBS, the increased partnerships to release movies on iTunes […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Books That Would Make Great E-Books &#171; Snarkmarket</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34366</link>
		<dc:creator>The Books That Would Make Great E-Books &#171; Snarkmarket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34366</guid>
		<description>[...] how it looks, then digs into the guts of the files to find WebKit, CSS, etc., while Tristan Lewis wonders about the possibility that the format could create something like an AppStore for content [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] how it looks, then digs into the guts of the files to find WebKit, CSS, etc., while Tristan Lewis wonders about the possibility that the format could create something like an AppStore for content […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34347</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34347</guid>
		<description>Kurt,

I suspect that iTunes will remain the name going forward, much as we have stores like &quot;Tower Records&quot; still in existence. And I, like you, suspect that the future for the mac mini is as a media center type of PC, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/01/14/the-mac-mini-platform/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;something I initially talked about almost 5 years ago&lt;/a&gt;. Since then, though, I&#039;ve come to think that Steve Jobs does not want to mix the entertainment experience with the computing one so the mini is a bit of an odd bird these days...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt,</p>
<p>I suspect that iTunes will remain the name going forward, much as we have stores like “Tower Records” still in existence. And I, like you, suspect that the future for the mac mini is as a media center type of PC, <a href="http://www.tnl.net/blog/2005/01/14/the-mac-mini-platform/" rel="nofollow">something I initially talked about almost 5 years ago</a>. Since then, though, I’ve come to think that Steve Jobs does not want to mix the entertainment experience with the computing one so the mini is a bit of an odd bird these days…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Trew</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34345</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Trew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34345</guid>
		<description>I think that Apple is in a prime position to be able to offer consumers a gateway to a multitude of media because of its experience in digital publishing. I also think that early next year Apple will be forced to reconsider the name, iTunes. It&#039;s still half relevant, but with the introduction of in recent years of films/movies, spoken word, e-comic distribution (via the iTunes LP, podcast etc., the &#039;Tunes&#039; part of the name will have to change to truly reflect the broad offerings that the company will be able to offer. I wrote about this in my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icebergcreative.com/2009/09/14/is-the-fat-lady-warming-up-for-itunes-final-verse/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;graphic design&lt;/a&gt; blog.

I also think that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icebergcreative.com/2009/01/06/apple-to-merge-mac-mini-and-apple-tv/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apple TV and the Mac Mini&lt;/a&gt; would form the perfect merger. A &#039;casual&#039; computer that could offer basic functionality as a home computer, but would excel at functions with regards to entertainment would give Apple a real way in to the Media Centre market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Apple is in a prime position to be able to offer consumers a gateway to a multitude of media because of its experience in digital publishing. I also think that early next year Apple will be forced to reconsider the name, iTunes. It’s still half relevant, but with the introduction of in recent years of films/movies, spoken word, e-comic distribution (via the iTunes LP, podcast etc., the ‘Tunes’ part of the name will have to change to truly reflect the broad offerings that the company will be able to offer. I wrote about this in my <a href="http://www.icebergcreative.com/2009/09/14/is-the-fat-lady-warming-up-for-itunes-final-verse/" rel="nofollow">graphic design</a> blog.</p>
<p>I also think that the <a href="http://www.icebergcreative.com/2009/01/06/apple-to-merge-mac-mini-and-apple-tv/" rel="nofollow">Apple TV and the Mac Mini</a> would form the perfect merger. A ‘casual’ computer that could offer basic functionality as a home computer, but would excel at functions with regards to entertainment would give Apple a real way in to the Media Centre market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34317</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34317</guid>
		<description>Nathan,

I&#039;m not yet over-40 (getting pretty darned close though) but the reality is that most of the new technologies are aimed at the sub-30s crowd, whether it is in music or in the rest of the consumer electronic space. We can wish it otherwise and it&#039;s true that there are MANY customers over 30 but it appears that the primary concern of electronics manufacturers are to ensure support in this sub-30s crowd. 

Decrying that reality does not make it go away, as you rightly point out :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan,</p>
<p>I’m not yet over-40 (getting pretty darned close though) but the reality is that most of the new technologies are aimed at the sub-30s crowd, whether it is in music or in the rest of the consumer electronic space. We can wish it otherwise and it’s true that there are MANY customers over 30 but it appears that the primary concern of electronics manufacturers are to ensure support in this sub-30s crowd. </p>
<p>Decrying that reality does not make it go away, as you rightly point out <img src='http://www.tnl.net/editor/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34292</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34292</guid>
		<description>Tristan,

I think Hamranhansenhansen was taking exception to your statement that the &quot;stereotypical Apple customer&quot; was under 40.

The reality, I believe, is that the bulk of music consumption is by teens to 20-somethings (that period when they have a lot of time &amp; energy, some spending money, and not yet saddled with career and family). This is not specific to Apple or the iTunes store. As an older music appreciater myself, I also believe that the over-40 crowd is a fairly wide tail, but it doesn&#039;t wag the dog.

Thanks for the insightful &amp; thought-provoking analysis. It should be fun to see where this all goes. I&#039;d like my appletv to be more useful.

Cheers,
Nathan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tristan,</p>
<p>I think Hamranhansenhansen was taking exception to your statement that the “stereotypical Apple customer” was under 40.</p>
<p>The reality, I believe, is that the bulk of music consumption is by teens to 20-somethings (that period when they have a lot of time &amp; energy, some spending money, and not yet saddled with career and family). This is not specific to Apple or the iTunes store. As an older music appreciater myself, I also believe that the over-40 crowd is a fairly wide tail, but it doesn’t wag the dog.</p>
<p>Thanks for the insightful &amp; thought-provoking analysis. It should be fun to see where this all goes. I’d like my appletv to be more useful.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Nathan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34289</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 03:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34289</guid>
		<description>Hamranhansenhansen, 

As the former owner of a Sinclair zx81, I would beg to differ on the idea that the Mac was the only interesting computer in the 80s. I also believe that the Amstrad line in Europe and the Commodore 64 were interesting machines :)

As far as music, you&#039;re inherently wrong. Most of the music from the late 80s didn&#039;t involve the mac. 

And Tim Berners-Lee did indeed invent the web a while back but I think it was around 1991, if memory serves me right (I administered sunsite.unc.edu, which we launched in 1993 and was one of the first 25 sites on the web)

However, while what you point out is interesting, what does it have to do with the discussion at hand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hamranhansenhansen, </p>
<p>As the former owner of a Sinclair zx81, I would beg to differ on the idea that the Mac was the only interesting computer in the 80s. I also believe that the Amstrad line in Europe and the Commodore 64 were interesting machines <img src='http://www.tnl.net/editor/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As far as music, you’re inherently wrong. Most of the music from the late 80s didn’t involve the mac. </p>
<p>And Tim Berners-Lee did indeed invent the web a while back but I think it was around 1991, if memory serves me right (I administered sunsite.unc.edu, which we launched in 1993 and was one of the first 25 sites on the web)</p>
<p>However, while what you point out is interesting, what does it have to do with the discussion at hand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamranhansenhansen</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34286</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamranhansenhansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 03:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34286</guid>
		<description>Apple had been around since 1977 and inspires great product loyalty. There are many 40  Mac users. The idea that Apple is a turn of the century phenomenon is completely wrong. During the 80&#039;s the Mac was the only interesting computer and definitely the only creative one. During the 90&#039;s it was still the only sensible choice. Most of the music from the late 80&#039;s and the 90&#039;s was made on a Mac in some way. The Web was invented in 1990 on a NeXT cube by a guy who is well over 40 now.

Young whippersnappers, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple had been around since 1977 and inspires great product loyalty. There are many 40  Mac users. The idea that Apple is a turn of the century phenomenon is completely wrong. During the 80’s the Mac was the only interesting computer and definitely the only creative one. During the 90’s it was still the only sensible choice. Most of the music from the late 80’s and the 90’s was made on a Mac in some way. The Web was invented in 1990 on a NeXT cube by a guy who is well over 40 now.</p>
<p>Young whippersnappers, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34285</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 02:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34285</guid>
		<description>Negative, the iTunes LP cannot go full-screen... yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Negative, the iTunes LP cannot go full-screen… yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34280</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34280</guid>
		<description>Ryan,

Thanks for mentioning that. You know, I had totally missed that. I just checked the resolution on my macbook and you&#039;re right. I think iTunes LP can go full screen ( wasn&#039;t that part of the demo during its introduction?) but will have to double check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,</p>
<p>Thanks for mentioning that. You know, I had totally missed that. I just checked the resolution on my macbook and you’re right. I think iTunes LP can go full screen ( wasn’t that part of the demo during its introduction?) but will have to double check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34279</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34279</guid>
		<description>Pierre,

Brilliant line of thought. I hadn&#039;t considered the http streaming but your analysis makes total sense and seems to tie into the idea of broadcasting from the iPhone. One could easily charging for some &quot;live report from the scene&quot; for example....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pierre,</p>
<p>Brilliant line of thought. I hadn’t considered the http streaming but your analysis makes total sense and seems to tie into the idea of broadcasting from the iPhone. One could easily charging for some “live report from the scene” for example.…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34278</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34278</guid>
		<description>Jay, 

Thanks for sharing what you found.

I suspect we may see an AppleTV version of Safari, but probably without Adobe Flash (in a fashion similar to the one on the iPhone)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing what you found.</p>
<p>I suspect we may see an AppleTV version of Safari, but probably without Adobe Flash (in a fashion similar to the one on the iPhone)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34277</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34277</guid>
		<description>I think it does but I need to double check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it does but I need to double check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34276</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34276</guid>
		<description>A.T.,

Thanks for the comment,

True, tools like Tunecore are indeed part of the equation in today&#039;s world but what would happen if Apple decided to disable access to the iTunes store from it? What if iTunes Connect were the only way to get onto iTunes? Would artists then abandon Apple? 

iPhoto and iMovie are indeed consumer tools but I&#039;m sure that they could be an entry. There&#039;s a lot of consumer generated content out there that, for one reason or another, does not necessarily need high production value. So your assumption is based on the concept that Apple would need to make many changes to &quot;professionalize&quot; those tools, which I suspect is a flawed assumption.

As far as video editing built into the OS, if the core separation of tracks, frames, etc... could be easily access through some of the QT API, some new tools could emerge. Not sure of what but my gut tells me that directionally, it might work. And direct publishing from the OS might allow someone to use any professional tool and publish to store with a single click.

You have the right to feel my assumptions are incorrect and you are right that I&#039;m projecting based on those assumption but that&#039;s what prognostication or forecasting is about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A.T.,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment,</p>
<p>True, tools like Tunecore are indeed part of the equation in today’s world but what would happen if Apple decided to disable access to the iTunes store from it? What if iTunes Connect were the only way to get onto iTunes? Would artists then abandon Apple? </p>
<p>iPhoto and iMovie are indeed consumer tools but I’m sure that they could be an entry. There’s a lot of consumer generated content out there that, for one reason or another, does not necessarily need high production value. So your assumption is based on the concept that Apple would need to make many changes to “professionalize” those tools, which I suspect is a flawed assumption.</p>
<p>As far as video editing built into the OS, if the core separation of tracks, frames, etc… could be easily access through some of the QT API, some new tools could emerge. Not sure of what but my gut tells me that directionally, it might work. And direct publishing from the OS might allow someone to use any professional tool and publish to store with a single click.</p>
<p>You have the right to feel my assumptions are incorrect and you are right that I’m projecting based on those assumption but that’s what prognostication or forecasting is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.T.</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34270</link>
		<dc:creator>A.T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34270</guid>
		<description>Sorry to say this, but apparently you have no idea what is going on regarding iTunes or online publishing in general. Almost every single artist on Youtube, with even a small following is already publishing to most of the available online stores (not only iTunes) through services like http://www.tunecore.com/

And guess what, they don&#039;t pay 30% commission, but $0.99/track

And iPhoto, iMovie or iWeb are great tools to create content you want to share with your family and frieds, but not for things you want to sell, that should be pretty obvious, there is no indication what so ever, that Apple intended otherwise.

I have no Idea where you are going with that idea that video editing is build into the OS. Even if it was, you can only clip the beginning or the ending, how useful is that for content producers who want to be payed for that content.

Whatever, you build your ideas on wrong assumptions and make up things as you go. Alas, kudos for getting featured on DF for this BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to say this, but apparently you have no idea what is going on regarding iTunes or online publishing in general. Almost every single artist on Youtube, with even a small following is already publishing to most of the available online stores (not only iTunes) through services like <a href="http://www.tunecore.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tunecore.com/</a></p>
<p>And guess what, they don’t pay 30% commission, but $0.99/track</p>
<p>And iPhoto, iMovie or iWeb are great tools to create content you want to share with your family and frieds, but not for things you want to sell, that should be pretty obvious, there is no indication what so ever, that Apple intended otherwise.</p>
<p>I have no Idea where you are going with that idea that video editing is build into the OS. Even if it was, you can only clip the beginning or the ending, how useful is that for content producers who want to be payed for that content.</p>
<p>Whatever, you build your ideas on wrong assumptions and make up things as you go. Alas, kudos for getting featured on DF for this BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donnacha &#124; WordSkill</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34269</link>
		<dc:creator>donnacha &#124; WordSkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34269</guid>
		<description>I agree with Michael that the new AppleTV will be the tablet - when they introduce it in February, it will be considerably more expensive than competing netbooks, so, Apple will be working hard to counter the inevitable meme that you are paying hundreds of dollars extra merely for the Apple brand.  To do this, they need to entirely merge the AppleTV line into the tablet, to give at least one clear example of a known value above and beyond what the netbooks can offer, notionally justifying $229 of the extra cost.

Michael suggestion of an Airport like device that you stick into the back of your TV is also bang on, although this will, of course, cost an extra $50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Michael that the new AppleTV will be the tablet — when they introduce it in February, it will be considerably more expensive than competing netbooks, so, Apple will be working hard to counter the inevitable meme that you are paying hundreds of dollars extra merely for the Apple brand.  To do this, they need to entirely merge the AppleTV line into the tablet, to give at least one clear example of a known value above and beyond what the netbooks can offer, notionally justifying $229 of the extra cost.</p>
<p>Michael suggestion of an Airport like device that you stick into the back of your TV is also bang on, although this will, of course, cost an extra $50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34266</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34266</guid>
		<description>Uh, the 13&quot; Macbook is already 1280x800, so full screen 720p is not a problem. 720p content in another window is where the scrollbars come in. Does iTunes LP have a full screen mode?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, the 13″ Macbook is already 1280x800, so full screen 720p is not a problem. 720p content in another window is where the scrollbars come in. Does iTunes LP have a full screen mode?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Lebeaupin</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34264</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Lebeaupin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34264</guid>
		<description>You know, I have been thinking about this for a slightly different case: when Apple introduced HTTP streaming (first in iPhoneOS 3.0, then Snow Leopard). Why did they introduce this technology instead of using existing streaming technologies like RTSP that they had always supported so far (with e.g. QT Streaming Server)? Sure, there&#039;s the fact HTTP Streaming does not need special firewall support, but in my opinion it&#039;s a side bonus, not the whole story. The whole story, in my opinion, is that it makes much easier to set up a live content &quot;streaming&quot; server. It&#039;s simple: no one can reasonably set up a RTSP server on its home connection (usually horrible upload bandwidth and ISP terms that prevent it anyway), and installing one on a remote host requires special hosting that allows you to install any software on the server, which is an expensive proposition; and at any rate this is a technically complicated endeavor; so it&#039;s both technically and financially challenging for individuals or small entities. So the RTSP servers that exist tend to be controlled by big content providers who are stringy with they RTPS &quot;channels&quot;.

Any parallels? See where I&#039;m going?

With HTTP streaming, while you do have some non-trivial setup on the recording side (camera + encoder + stream segmenter software), the complexity is entirely on the local side and from there the result &quot;just&quot; needs to be sent as it is recorded to regular HTTP hosting (which of course you&#039;ve made sure has sufficient bandwidth to serve the connections you&#039;ll get). While one could make a permanent TV channel with this tech, this strikes me as so last century, instead I think it will be more for event-like things, for instance an indie band could record and broadcast its concerts- live. I think it has the potential to generate a revolution similar to the &quot;radio libres&quot; (a movement in France in the 70s-80s similar to that of LPFM broadcasting in the US).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I have been thinking about this for a slightly different case: when Apple introduced HTTP streaming (first in iPhoneOS 3.0, then Snow Leopard). Why did they introduce this technology instead of using existing streaming technologies like RTSP that they had always supported so far (with e.g. QT Streaming Server)? Sure, there’s the fact HTTP Streaming does not need special firewall support, but in my opinion it’s a side bonus, not the whole story. The whole story, in my opinion, is that it makes much easier to set up a live content “streaming” server. It’s simple: no one can reasonably set up a RTSP server on its home connection (usually horrible upload bandwidth and ISP terms that prevent it anyway), and installing one on a remote host requires special hosting that allows you to install any software on the server, which is an expensive proposition; and at any rate this is a technically complicated endeavor; so it’s both technically and financially challenging for individuals or small entities. So the RTSP servers that exist tend to be controlled by big content providers who are stringy with they RTPS “channels”.</p>
<p>Any parallels? See where I’m going?</p>
<p>With HTTP streaming, while you do have some non-trivial setup on the recording side (camera + encoder + stream segmenter software), the complexity is entirely on the local side and from there the result “just” needs to be sent as it is recorded to regular HTTP hosting (which of course you’ve made sure has sufficient bandwidth to serve the connections you’ll get). While one could make a permanent TV channel with this tech, this strikes me as so last century, instead I think it will be more for event-like things, for instance an indie band could record and broadcast its concerts– live. I think it has the potential to generate a revolution similar to the “radio libres” (a movement in France in the 70s-80s similar to that of LPFM broadcasting in the US).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34263</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34263</guid>
		<description>Since I first dissected the iTunes LP, http://jwr.cc/x/3, I have figured out a lot more about the format. It is most definitely destined for AppleTV; there are mentions of it throughout the code. One of the first tags inside the index.html says &#039;meta name=&quot;hdtv-fullscreen&quot;&#039;. I cannot wait to see my iTunes LP and iTunes Extras on my AppleTV. 

The other interesting question is since Apple will provide an HTML engine in the AppleTV, will they let us browse the Internet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I first dissected the iTunes LP, <a href="http://jwr.cc/x/3" rel="nofollow">http://jwr.cc/x/3</a>, I have figured out a lot more about the format. It is most definitely destined for AppleTV; there are mentions of it throughout the code. One of the first tags inside the index.html says ‘meta name=“hdtv-fullscreen“‘. I cannot wait to see my iTunes LP and iTunes Extras on my AppleTV. </p>
<p>The other interesting question is since Apple will provide an HTML engine in the AppleTV, will they let us browse the Internet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple Storms Hollywood &#124; TightWind</title>
		<link>http://www.tnl.net/blog/2009/09/16/apple-storms-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-34259</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple Storms Hollywood &#124; TightWind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tnl.net/blog/?p=1475#comment-34259</guid>
		<description>[...] Tristan Louis wonders whether Apple will do to film what they did to applications:  True, the company now offers rentals and sales of video content but what if it could open up a marketplace where every independent content creator could distribute content? What if independent movie-makers or musicians could sell directly through the iTunes store and provide content on all the apple platforms (TV, iPod, phone, computer) with a single click. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Tristan Louis wonders whether Apple will do to film what they did to applications:  True, the company now offers rentals and sales of video content but what if it could open up a marketplace where every independent content creator could distribute content? What if independent movie-makers or musicians could sell directly through the iTunes store and provide content on all the apple platforms (TV, iPod, phone, computer) with a single click. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 15/39 queries in 0.359 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.tnl.net @ 2012-02-10 00:56:53 -->
