TNL.net is designed for modern browsers but the content is still readable in older ones. If you want to ensure the best experience, please install a browser that was developed after 2009.

tnl.net

The end of local storage

Look­ing at longer term trends, I’ve come to the con­clu­sion that record­able CDs, DVDs, and USB dri­ves are going the way of the dodo and will be mostly gone from the tech land­scape by 2020. Along with them, things like recorded DVDs will dis­ap­pear, upend­ing much of the exist­ing dig­i­tal con­tent dis­tri­b­u­tion models.

An abbre­vi­ated his­tory of storage

Any­one who has used a com­puter has found them­selves in the same sit­u­a­tion: at some point, they have needed to take infor­ma­tion off the com­puter in order to share it on another computer.

In the old days, this was done via diskettes, which were replaced by CDs, and even­tu­ally CDs were dis­placed by record­able DVDs and USB solid-state drives.

In the cor­po­rate (or pro­sumer) mar­ket, larger data needs led to the use of ZipDisk, Syquest dri­ves, and even­tu­ally file servers.

As house­hold increased their exper­tise in the tech space, we’ve seen the rise of Net­work Acces­si­ble Stor­age (NAS) devices for home use (for exam­ple, the pop­u­lar Apple Time Cap­sule or the WD MyBook series).

Devices vs. Desktops

But over the last few years, the stor­age land­scape has grown more com­pli­cated. As more con­sumers carry smart­phones, portable media play­ers, dig­i­tal cam­eras, and cam­corders, or play dig­i­tal con­tent down­loaded for their tele­vi­sions, the com­puter is loos­ing its dom­i­nance on usage of dig­i­tal media. And, along the way, the com­puter is no longer the hub of every­thing dig­i­tal in the household.

Dig­i­tal con­tent is now spread across that wide array of devices and will become increas­ingly unteth­ered from the com­puter to the point where some house­hold may remain heavy con­sumer of dig­i­tal media with­out even own­ing a computer.

Mean­while, in the busi­ness world, con­tent sit­ting on employ­ees’ com­put­ers is hard to find and harder to con­trol. Lap­tops can walk away from a com­pany with cru­cial com­pany con­tent on their hard dri­ves so there’s an increase push to get users to save their infor­ma­tion on cen­tral­ized servers.

Enters the cloud

How­ever, along with the spread of devices, there has been a grow­ing spread in avail­able band­width at higher speed. A decade ago, the major­ity of inter­net users were access­ing it at speed of about 56kbps. Today, that num­ber has gone up 100-fold and will con­tinue to go up (by some esti­mate, the 100Mbps mark will be stan­dard by 2020.)

With extra band­width to spare, data can now be stored more effi­ciently on remote servers.

In the con­sumer space, peo­ple are increas­ingly stor­ing their videos on YouTube or Flickr, their images on Flickr and Face­book, and other files on the likes of Google Docs. Social net­works are becom­ing a large repos­i­tory of backup data that can be shared with friends or locked away.

And today, some solu­tions are allow­ing for such things to hap­pen auto­mat­i­cally from the devices to the web. For exam­ple, I use Eye.fi cards in most of my cam­eras, which dynam­i­cally upload the con­tent of the cam­era to the online service(s) of my choice. They also have soft­ware based solu­tions that run on the iPhone and Android devices. Pix­elpipe, one of their com­peti­tors, is soft­ware based only.

In the enter­prise space, com­pa­nies like drop­box, drop.io, and box.net pro­vide solu­tions that store the files on their servers and allow end-users to access them from any com­puter or mobile devices.

Cre­ation, Dis­tri­b­u­tion, Consumption

Up until recently, I was pretty opposed to the iPad as a device, see­ing it as a con­sump­tion only device. Over the last few months, as more tools have become avail­able, we’ve seen a slew of tools allow­ing peo­ple to use the iPad in cre­ative ways. My blind spot was to equal stor­age with cre­ation and assum­ing that con­tent was not stored locally, it would be issue from a cre­ation standpoint.

But I was wrong.

In today’s world, con­tent that sits locally is pretty much as good as dead. It is not dis­trib­uted and thus is not con­sumed. This epiphany came to me not as a result of using an ipad but while author­ing a story for my site. I real­ized that I was open­ing up my browser and launch­ing a web app to do so. The same had been true for most of my week and I often can go days with­out open­ing a desk­top app other than my browser. As a result, I’ve con­cluded that local stor­age is becom­ing increas­ingly irrelevant.

What is still rel­e­vant, though, is the exis­tence of some form of local stor­age. In the future, local stor­age will be used pri­mar­ily to hold con­tent and appli­ca­tion on a tem­po­rary basis before said con­tent and app return to the cloud. The rea­son for such an approach is that run­ning appli­ca­tion locally will always be more effi­cient than run­ning them over a net­work link.

Impact on con­sumer electronic

Prob­a­bly more impor­tant is the final impact on dig­i­tal media. The iPod was rev­o­lu­tion­ary in that it did away with the stan­dard model of dis­tri­b­u­tion for music: CDs are increas­ingly get­ting replaced by dig­i­tal dis­tri­b­u­tion and may con­tinue to exist as a spe­cial­ized domain (much like there are still some LP record pur­chasers today.)

The Kin­dle (and its com­peti­tors in the e-reader cat­e­gory) are start­ing to do the same thing to mag­a­zines, news­pa­pers and books.

The iPad takes music, books, mag­a­zines, news­pa­pers, TV shows, and other video con­tent and runs them through a sin­gle device.

The same thing is about to hap­pen to all video con­tent. Today, com­pa­nies like Net­flix shuf­fle a lot of plas­tic back and forth so the plas­tic piece can be played on a spe­cial­ized device (either a DVD or Blu­Ray player) and then returned. Net­flix has seen the writ­ing on the wall and is increas­ingly try­ing to push its users (and providers) to move to a plastic-free world by stream­ing the media directly to the device of their choice. Much like kids today may not really under­stand the con­cept of rewind­ing a video tape, the kids of tomor­row will not under­stand the idea of putting some­thing into a machine in order to play it.

As stream­ing dis­tri­b­u­tion becomes more com­mon, atti­tudes towards the disks will change so that such things are only cater­ing to a much smaller audience.

My five-year-old son looks at DVDs as some­thing you can dec­o­rate in art projects, not some­thing you can play. His view is that every­thing is avail­able on demand either via my com­puter, smart­phone, or our con­nected TV (Try explain­ing to a 5-year-old that Wall-E is not avail­able because it’s out­side the release win­dow set by the stu­dios). With the advent of Apple TV and Google TV, his expe­ri­ence is about to become more common.

He’s the con­sumer of tomor­row and his view is that stor­age is some­thing that hap­pens in the cloud. In his teenage years, he might end up look­ing at USB dri­ves with the same dis­dain as we look at videotapes.

Originally published on October 17, 2010 in Technology . You may find related thoughts pieces under the following terms: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://doc.searls.com Doc Searls

    All good points. But much of it won’t hap­pen as long as data con­nec­tions remain con­sti­pated, asym­met­ri­cal and overpriced.

    The bot­tle­neck here is the car­ri­ers. Good luck talk­ing sense to them. Right now those serv­ing homes are all slather­ing over the move of TV to IP, because they can get to inter­me­di­ate the charge-for-content game that cable TV has been for decades, but on a more gran­u­lar à la carte basis. Mean­while the mobile car­ri­ers would rather limit data use and enjoy the ben­e­fits of “bill shock” to com­pli­ant 3G cus­tomers who make the mis­take of using data con­nec­tions while “roam­ing” across national borders.

    In fact, the car­ri­ers can ben­e­fit from the cloud enor­mously, but locat­ing local stor­age beside fat back­bone, con­di­tioned power and free real estate at cable head ends and telco cen­tral offices, and offer ser­vices either on their own branded basis or white labeled from Ama­zon, Google and Rackspace.

    But, again, good luck get­ting any­where with them on it. They’ll keep push­ing ‘triple play” until they real­ize they’ve struck out.

    IMHO on a Fri­day after­noon, any­way. :-)

  • http://www.tnl.net/ Tris­tan Louis

    Doc,

    I agree that the data con­nec­tions need to be there but I sus­pect that it’s only a ques­tion of time. 100Mbps should be enough and I sus­pect that we’ll see that in the next decade or so.

    The worry, on my end, is actu­ally that this will become more of the norm. The net-net of such a norm is that end-users will no longer have full con­trol over their bits as those bits will now be stored on some cor­po­rate server somewhere.

    At that point, our bits will be reg­u­lated under poten­tially oner­ous terms of ser­vices that could lead to those cor­po­ra­tions own­ing more of the con­tent than we do.

  • Pingback: Goodbye PC — TNL.net