A Call for Ethical Tech
Software developers must consider the ethical impact of their actions or risk dire consequences.
You’re a suspect
Apple, AT&T, Bank, Boston, Bush administration, cellular telephone, cent, Code, Congress, Crime prevention, digital certificate, email, entrepreneur, Ethics, Europe, Facebook, FBI facility, Federal Bureau of Investigation, federal government, financials networks, FOIA, Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, France, Freedom of Information Act, Google, Internet privacy, law, Mass surveillance, Microsoft, mobile operator, mydata, National security, National Security Agency, NSA, NSA warrantless surveillance controversy, online hacking, online service, Patriot Act, Pentagon, Prime Minister, Privacy, Privacy Act, Privacy of telecommunications, representative, Security, Sprint, spy, Such Agency, Surveillance, Twin Towers, U.S. Congress, UN Court, United Kingdom, United States, US government, Verizon, White House
A free society can exist in a terror-laden world. Here's what you can do.
Protecting our electronic infrastructures
America, American Civil Liberties Union, anonymous, China, Computer law, Computer security, Congress, Coordinator, Cyberwarfare, Department of Homeland Security, electronic infrastructure, Electronic warfare, Ethics, executive, government, hacking, House of Representatives, Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, Internet privacy, Janet Napolitano, Java, LOLSEC, Military technology, Obama, online infrastructures, Richard Clarke, Russia, secretary, Secretary of Defense, Security, senate, State of the Union, technology world, the New York Times, Tim Berners-Lee, Twitter, U.S. Congress, United States, United States Department of Homeland Security, US department of defense, US federal reserve, US government, World War III
The US government gets serious about electronic threats.
Dark Side of the Blogosphere
Death threat against a popular blogger represent a new challenge to free speech on the internet.
5 years
9/11, behavior, Carlos Dominguez, Cynthia Giugliano, David Halderman, David Vera, Emotions, Ethics, Gerard Jean Baptiste, Istanbul, Jeremy Glick, London, Madrid, Mark Ellis, Melissa Vincent, Michael DiPasquale, Mind, Mumbai, Munro, New York, Pain, Personal life, Sorrow, Steve Weinberg, Suffering, Tom McCann, Washington DC, WTC
9/11 @ 5
Blog, Internet, and Marketing
For the past week, I’ve been posting a fair amount about the raging cow and about establishing trust in a market where marketers are trying to get in side by side with other bloggers. Chris Pirillo makes some good points about the raging cow campaign: Is it so bad if they are trying to engage us in a conversation? If markets are conversations, as a popular book says, is Dr. Pepper doing the right thing? It’s a tough question to answer. After all, they are trying to do what we told them they should do. On a related matter, the blog world is now abuzz with a description of the Internet as an agreement. While the document provides an interesting set of concepts that are sound from a purely technical standpoint (yes, the underlying standards of the Internet are based on an agreement), it does not cover the variety of choices of what is on the Internet. If the goal is to say “hey, the Internet is just an agreement to tie networks together” then World of Ends succeeds. But the contention that this makes a difference does not really matter much in today’s world. What world of ends does…
Trust, truth and networks
The raging cow incident shows that there’s a need to establish trust in the blogging (and maybe the web) world. Tim Bray demonstrates that most bloggers have relationships to products, concepts, companies, and other bloggers. His declaration of truth is a good start but there are a number of things that still need to be done. Meanwhile, Scott Johnson asks the important question: How will we establish the current level of trust we have for blogs?. It is an important question that requires much thought. In the discussions surrounding my suggestion of how we can level the playing field, I’ve learned a couple of things: First, whatever solution we come up with must be easy to implement. It is easy for those of us who are more technical to come up with XML rules and complex structure to represent the world. However, most people neither have interest nor experience in experimenting with such thing. Hence the first rule of any answer is that whatever solution is implemented, it needs to be simple. Second, trust is a very large issue and some portions of it are being addressed. For example, FOAF allows you to establish trust between friends. But what about…
2000 Tech Politics
Access, Andy Grove, Apple, CEO, Chairman, Chairwoman, Cisco Systems Michael Dell, Dell Computers Andy Grove, digital media, E-Government, Election, encryption, Ethics, Federal Trade Commission, H-1B visa, Identity management, Information Technology, Intel, Intel John Doerr, Internet development, Internet field, Internet privacy, Internet Tax Freedom Act, Internet tax moratorium, John Chambers, John Doerr, Kleiner Perkins Steve Jobs, law, Marimba, Michael Dell, online, online privacy, Online Taxes Calls, parody site, Pixar Kim Polese, Privacy, Republican Party, technology agenda, technology sector, Texas, United States
Where the 2000 presidential candidates stand on internet issues.
The Privacy Police Strikes
Big Brother, Browser, Company Expansion, Congress, corporate web, data privacy law, e - commerce, Ethics, Europe, European Union, Federal Trade Commission, head, HTTP cookie, Identity management, Information privacy, Internet builders, Internet privacy, Microsoft, online consumers, online electronics store, outside web, P3P, Privacy, Privacy policy, rabid consumer data privacy advocate, Survivor, tech news site, United States, US department of commerce, web browsers, Web Consortium, Web experience, web-forms, webmaster, World Wide Web
What is P3P and why it may matter to your site