TNL.net is designed for modern browsers but the content is still readable in older ones. If you want to ensure the best experience, please install a browser that was developed after 2009.

tnl.net

Standards as social contracts

June 7, 2006

Look­ing at the efforts Dave Winer is under­tak­ing in terms of get­ting OPML to become yet another stan­dard, I’ve been think­ing about how for­mats get adopted. The key insight I came up with is that stan­dards are actu­ally a form of social con­tract and increas­ingly, data for­mats is fol­low­ing the same path. Look­ing at the his­tory In order […]

RSS and Media: Can’t we all just get along?

June 29, 2005

I keep try­ing to work on an entry to close the loop on the search engine and links research but RSS news is get­ting in the way. Last week, it was Microsoft’s wel­come endorse­ment and a new set of exten­sions and this week, it’s Apple and its announce­ment of a new spec­i­fi­ca­tion to add more data to […]

Microsoft Loves RSS

June 23, 2005

The blo­gosh­pere is buzzing about Microsoft’s announced sup­port for RSS. Here’s a quick his­tory of how they got there, and the good and bad on what they are adding to the stan­dard. How we got there? Microsoft is not really a new player in the syn­di­ca­tion space. With the release of Inter­net Explorer 4.0, in 1997, the Redmond […]

A response to Dan Gillmor

April 10, 2003

Dan Gill­mor is writ­ing a book about jour­nal­ism and blog­ging and asked peo­ple to help him with it. I have just sent an email on the intro­duc­tion and fig­ured it might be use­ful to other peo­ple inter­ested in this sub­ject. So here it is: You are hit­ting on the right points but there may be a need here for […]

Suggestions for RSS .92 spec

October 12, 2000

I’d like to sug­gest a few optional addi­tions to the spec­i­fi­ca­tion. Here are some ideas I’d like to throw around for dis­cus­sion: At the item level : This would allow us to spec­ify a par­tic­u­lar date for an item. I think it would be nice for those of us who have sev­eral days’ worth of con­tent in their RDF […]